Why the End of Sofía Vergara's Frozen Embryo Legal Battle Is So Important
After a court battle lasting more than a year, a Louisiana federal judge dismissed the case against Sofía Vergara in which her former fiancé Nick Loeb argued he had the right to their frozen embryos, E News reported.
Back in December 2016, we learned that Vergara was being sued — not by Loeb, but by two embryos she created with him in 2013. This may sound like just another far-fetched Hollywood scenario, but in reality, the case had the potential to be a landmark case having wider effects on the concept of what it means to be a person with legal rights. It's also an important reminder to always pay attention to contracts.
Now that this legal ridiculousness is out of the way, it's a good time to revisit the questions this unusual court case raised: Can embryos sue people? Logistically, how do they even file the paperwork from a freezer? How is embry-bro Loeb still in the news?
To make this story a little easier to digest, here are three things you need to know about the dismissed lawsuit that potentially had implications beyond the former couple.
1. Apparently, random men in Louisiana can name your embryos
The plaintiff in the case was a man named James Carbonnet, who is listed as the embryos’ “trustee,” despite the fact that he has no clear relationship with either Vergara or Loeb. In addition to going through the hassle of filing the right-to-live lawsuit on behalf of two embryos, he also took it upon himself to name them “Emma” and “Isabella.”
In other words, he Googled “popular baby names for girls 2013” and went with the top two contenders. Clearly, this was done in an attempt to establish relatable identities for the embryos to garner public support.
2. There is a mysterious trust set up for the embryos, coincidentally also in Louisiana
The crux of the lawsuit was that by not permitting “Emma” and “Isabella” to be born, they are being deprived of their inheritance, which, it just so happens, is in a trust in Louisiana — a very anti-abortion state. The lawsuit requested that the embryos be returned to Loeb so he could implant and gestate them via a surrogate, thereby receiving the money in the trust, which would be used to fund their health care and education.
3. The basis of the lawsuit is requesting that a legal contract is voided
You might be wondering why Vergara and Loeb didn’t sign a contract regarding custody of the embryos when they were created at the fertility clinic. Actually, they did, and it states that neither party could use the embryos without the consent of the other. What was missing, however, was a clause specifically addressing what would happen if the couple broke up, which Loeb has tried to use as a reason why he should be granted custody of the embryos.
But really, the whole part about not using them without the consent of the other pretty much covers that anyway. The lesson here, prospective fertility clinic patrons, is to really go over that contract carefully before moving forward with creating the embryos that may later take you to court.