Did ESPN Magazine
Go Too Far?

ESPN Magazine's latest issue is just hitting newsstands, but it's already causing waves with some of its readers. The sports magazine, considered by many families to be 'safe' reading for everyone, took a bold step with its 'Body Issue,' which features nude athletes in poses that keep the private areas covered. So, what do parents think?

In the world of sports magazines, Sports Illustrated is known for its risque swimsuit issue and ESPN Magazine is known as the 'safer' option - a magazine that the whole family can read all year long, learning about athletes and sports along the way. But the latest issue of the magazine, the 'Body Issue' took on a different air with photos of athletes from many different sports, posing nude with just enough covering up to prevent full-on nudity.

For many parents, the issue is a big issue.

Too much skin

Many parents were shocked by the issue and have taken steps to prevent their kids from what they consider unnecessary nudity. Marty Guise said that his wife waited for him to get home, and then they tossed it in the recycling bin before their kids could get a glimpse. "It is not why we chose to subscribe to the magazine," says Guise. "We aren't canceling our subscription because it was a one-time renewal that only cost a penny. However, we do not plan to renew again."

Father Michael Shannon said that his wife tore out all the objectionable pages before they let their son see the magazine. They aren't ready to cancel their subscription yet, but if another Body Issue is released they will. "We already opt out of the SI swimsuit issue and have no desire for this soft porn from ESPN to enter our house. I'm sure the magazine staff had fun on the photo shoot, but cheap titillation has no place in a sports magazine for the family," says Shannon.

Setting women back?

Mom Colleen Reynolds hasn't even opened the magazine yet -- after her kids discovered the nude photo of Serena Williams on the cover. "Serena Williams is an accomplished athlete. She has struggled to gain respect and admiration for her sport. Why in the world would she agree to be on the cover of a primarily male oriented magazine naked? In a sensuous and flirty pose? I'm not sure if I'm more disappointed in ESPN or Serena Williams," says Reynolds.

She isn't ready to cancel her subscription because Reynolds says that the magazine generally helps foster communication in her house. But she isn't happy either. "Women have made such great strides in gaining respect for our wisdom and inner beauty. I as a parent am so careful to teach my son to respect women and treat them like princesses. Then, ESPN and Serena Williams throw a curveball at that teaching. How does a 9 year old boy differentiate between a noted female sports figure stripping naked to catch the eye of horny males and a woman who truly does respect herself enough to keep her clothes on and allow her accomplishments to speak for themselves?" asks Reynolds.

Next page: Parents who like the 'Body Issue'

Continue »
12

Tags: espn magazine kids body image sports role models

Recommended for you

Comments

Comments on "Parents react to ESPN Magazine's 'Body Issue'"

Louise Rentz October 13, 2013 | 11:57 PM

ESPN magazine is sold @ some schools for fundraising. There are many boys and girls who like sports and would be thrilled to receive it as a gift. Publishing an issues that is considered to be inappropriate for younger children by some, seems like a bad business decision on the part of the publisher. In fact, I was considering purchasing a subscription for my 11 year old grandson and did a "search" to check out whether it would be appropriate. I agree with those who say to leave the BODY shots for another publication.

Louise Rentz October 13, 2013 | 11:55 PM

ESPN magazine is sold @ some schools for fundraising. There are many boys and girls who like sports and would be thrilled to receive it as a gift. Publishing an issues that is considered to be inappropriate for younger children by some, seems like a bad business decision on the part of the publisher. In fact, I was considering purchasing a subscription for my 11 year old grandson and did a "search" to check out whether it would be appropriate. I agree with those who say to leave the BODY shots for another publication.

Craig McElvain October 08, 2010 | 11:25 AM

You can experiment with your own kids! ESPN & Disney did not ask my permission...if I had recourse to sue them- I would The issue is not your view of porn versus mine, it is -do you have the right to jam your view down my throat ? Craig McElvain

Megan October 22, 2009 | 9:12 AM

This puritanical American obsession with feigning disgust over the human body is sad and unnatural. The photos in this issue are beautiful - and not in any way "porn" as the one father says, soft or not. Perhaps if parents got over this fear of something everyone has - a body - and started acting like it is natural and not a big deal, kids wouldn't grow up with the kind of ual misinformation that leads to at 12, STDs and unwanted pregnancies. Yet another reason why we're the laughing stock of Europe.

+ Add Comment


(required - not published)