Tide Pods

A Chicago grandmother has launched a petition asking the makers of laundry detergent pods to have an additional layer of packaging. Is it the company’s obligation to make their product safer, or does the ultimate responsibility lie with parents?

Petition calls for big changes in packaging

When Erica Johnson’s 15-month-old grandson sank his teeth into a Tide Detergent Pod, she discovered exactly why they are so dangerous. He became ill almost immediately and was rushed to the hospital.

Thankfully, his life was saved — but there are little ones who haven’t been so fortunate. She was inspired to create a petition on Change.org asking the manufacturer, Procter & Gamble, to add an extra layer of packaging around each individual pod so other families won’t have to suffer if their child gets hold of one. Where do you stand on the issue?

Packaging needs improvement

Johnson argues that the pods, which are colorful and small, look like candy — and she contends that people who have to leave their home or apartment to wash their laundry at a public machine don’t transport the entire package. She states that the extra layer of packaging will ensure that no other children become gravely ill from accidental ingestion.

"If the medication companies are doing their part to be sure kids are safe, I think Tide should do the same."

Like Johnson, some moms feel that the company does have a responsibility to make their packaging safer. “Medications are made to be childproof and parents are also responsible for keeping them away from kids,” Ashley, mom of four, pointed out. “So if the medication companies are doing their part to be sure kids are safe, I think Tide should do the same. Way too many kids have died or become seriously ill from these packets.”

Rebecca agrees that Tide needs to reconsider the design of the product itself, as well as its packaging. “They are extremely attractive and colorful and swirly — and that is by design, not by necessity,” she explained. “I definitely think there is a responsibility when you are a huge company manufacturing potentially hazardous items to not make them so appealing to kids that they will want to eat them.”

Parents, watch your kids!

However, other moms believe that the ultimate duty lies with mom and dad, or other care-giving adult. “It's silly that a company should have to change their packaging because parents are keeping something dangerous within reach,” stated Heather, mom of two. “It says to keep it away from children, so keep it away from children.”

"We don't see people telling companies not to make blue window cleaner because it looks like Kool-Aid."

Brittney from Ohio agreed. “As horrible as I feel for these children and their families, I think it's the parents’ responsibility to keep their children safe,” she told us. “Parents are expected to keep sharp objects and chemical cleaners away from their children and I don't see this as being any different. We don't see people telling companies not to make blue window cleaner because it looks like Kool-Aid.”

Erica hopes that her petition will continue to gain ground — as of this writing, there were over 27,000 virtual signatures collected, with that number jumping by the minute. She wrote, “I believe that with enough support from consumers and parents concerned for their families' safety, Tide will listen and change their detergent pod packaging to look less like candy by adding an extra layer of protection around each pod and more clear warnings to reflect the real risk these pods have been proven to carry.”

It will be interesting to see what Tide’s answer is as the petition continues to gain momentum. But if you use these detergent pods, please make sure you keep them out of reach at all times, and if you transport them, keep tabs on them until you use them — it could save your child’s life.

More on child safety

Child safety checklist
Is your water poisoning your child?
Crib safety: Is your baby's sleep space safe?


Recommended for you


Comments on "Should laundry pods have better packaging?"

sally October 03, 2013 | 11:55 AM

It just goes to show you that parents aren't being responsible! You don't leave liquid soap on the floor or in reach, why leave the pods? And as for medications, you don't leave them in the reach of small children, so that is a redundant statement in the article! Parents, YOUR children are YOU responsibility! Act like parents!!!!

Rachel September 27, 2013 | 8:26 AM

@Noel Luckily your child had a mouthful of Cascade Dish Detergent and not a Tide Pod. Otherwise you would have found out the hard way like so many other parents are on a daily basis that this product is more dangerous than any other and your panicked call to poison control would have been a hysterical call to 911. This laundry detergent product is the most toxic on the market. Aside from the painful chemical burns the children will experience in his or her mouth and throat, the throat begins to swell and the lungs fill with fluid starving them of oxygen. Some have to be intubated. I am an ER nurse and I have seen this too often. An extra 20 seconds to open a pod is not alot to ask for to make sure no other child has to die. Im all for it!

Noel September 27, 2013 | 2:08 AM

It's not just Tide though. Take a look at Cascade dishwasher pods. Arm & Hammer laundry pods, All laundry pods, the new style of Finish pods. There are so many different brands, some are less brightly colored but they're all the same thing, they're all toxic, and a toddler would happily bite any of them. I really don't look forward to having to unwrap each pod before I put them in the dishwasher or washing machine. I dislike the old style of Finish dishwasher tabs for this reason. Adding an extra 20 seconds per load in the laundromat trying to keep my kids contained... call me silly, I don't want that. I keep my tabs (dishwasher and laundry) on top of the fridge. I have a 2 year old who defeats babyproofing gadgets. One panicked phonecall with Poison Control, rinsing out her mouthful of Cascade dishwasher tablet when she was 18 months old, taught me to keep them out of her reach. I've been there. I still don't want the extra layer of packaging in a world that already consumes too much plastic.

+ Add Comment

(required - not published)