Start writing
Share this Story

No, Planned Parenthood Still Doesn’t Use Federal Funds for Abortions

Dr. Elizabeth Yuko is the Health Editor at SheKnows. She is a bioethicist and writer specializing in sexual and reproductive health and the intersection of bioethics and popular culture. She is an adjunct professor of ethics at Fordham ...

Trump agrees to fund PP if they stop offering abortions, which aren't paid for by federal funds

Yesterday, President Donald Trump announced that he would preserve federal payments to Planned Parenthood — if they stopped providing one of their crucial medical services: abortions.

Just to recap: Federal funding currently does not fund abortions at Planned Parenthood. This is not news. This is something we have known for a long time and many people have been extremely vocal about.

More: Trans Rights Are Human Rights & Civil Rights, and Yes -- That Includes Bathrooms

“As I said throughout the campaign, I am pro-life and I am deeply committed to investing in women’s health and plan to significantly increase federal funding in support of nonabortion services such as cancer screenings,” Trump said yesterday in a statement to The New York Times. “Polling shows the majority of Americans oppose public funding for abortion, even those who identify as pro-choice. There is an opportunity for organizations to continue the important work they do in support of women’s health, while not providing abortion services.”

Ignoring the fact that Trump was vocally pro-choice until running for the Republican nomination (because hey, as Americans we have the right to decide that a woman’s autonomy is negotiable, right?) this statement is beyond troubling.

His argument hinges on the fact that according to an uncited poll, a majority of Americans oppose public funding for abortion — even those who identify as pro-choice. But again, here’s the thing: Federal funding is not used to pay for abortions. So if that’s what he’s basing his decision on, good news — Planned Parenthood will remain funded!

More: Oklahoma Lawmaker: Women Are "Hosts" And Need Permission for Abortion

Unfortunately, that logic relies on facts and Trump following through with previous commitments, which as we’ve seen repeatedly have no place in the White House or this administration.

Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand (D-NY) theorized that the president had made this statement only so he’d later be able to claim that he had made an offer to Planned Parenthood and that they were being unreasonable and unwilling to negotiate.

More: Kate Walsh on Why Defunding Planned Parenthood Would Be Disastrous

“The Trump administration needs to stop playing political games that would put access to the full range of safe reproductive care at risk, or they will get the fight of their lives,” Gillibrand said told The New York Times.

Amen, Kirsten.

Meanwhile learn more about what defunding Planned Parenthood actually means:

Comments
Follow Us

SheKnows Media ‐ Beauty and Style

Hot
New in Health & Wellness
Close

And you'll see personalized content just for you whenever you click the My Feed .

SheKnows is making some changes!

b h e a r d !

Welcome to the new SheKnows Community,

where you can share your stories, ideas

and CONNECT with millions of women.

Get Started