Share this Story

Justin Bieber somehow gets anti-paparazzi law overturned

Jaclyn is an Idaho native who currently lives in Milwaukee. Having worked in radio, TV and as a newspaper reporter, she is an avid pop culture and news junkie. She also has a passion for photography and cooking (but is still learning to ...

Judge rules it unconstitutional

After Bieber was chased by a paparazzo in July, L.A. prosecutors decided to charge the man under a never-before-used 2010 law. But today, a judge ruled that law unconstitutional.

Judge rules it unconstitutional

An anti-paparazzi law passed by the state of California was finally tested — by Justin Bieber, of all people — and it failed.

The law was passed in 2010 and is supposed to punish paparazzi chasing celebrities while driving dangerously. Justin Bieber called 911 in July of this year, saying he was being chased. The photographer, Paul Raef, was later charged with four different crimes.

"The case marks the first use of a 2010 state law designed to prevent paparazzi from dangerously pursuing celebrities for photos," said the Associated Press.

Raef was charged with four different misdemeanors, including "reckless driving, failing to obey a peace officer, and two counts of following another vehicle too closely and reckless driving with the intent to capture pictures for commercial gain," said the LA Times.

But the judge ruled that the law against following a vehicle too closely while driving recklessly and taking pictures violates a person's First Amendment rights. The judge also said that other professionals, such as wedding photographers and real estate agents, shouldn't be punished for rushing to their jobs. The judge said that under the law as it is currently written, those people could be punished if their appointment included a celebrity, even though they are not chasing that celebrity.

"The judge said that when you are talking about people doing their job and yet running the risk of additional criminal punishment, it has a chilling effect [on] anyone from newsgatherers to wedding photographers and even real estate agents," Raef’s attorney, David Kestenbaum, told the LA Times. "It's just a lesson in constitutional law."

But the decision doesn't mean Raef is off the hook. With the remaining two charges, he is still facing up to six months in jail.

According to TMZ, the law won't be overturned unless an appeals court sides with the trial judge.

Meanwhile, the decision is just another blow to Bieber, who is fresh off a breakup and was pulled over again on Tuesday. According to the LA Times, the singer was driving his Ferrari in Hollywood and made an "unsafe left-hand turn." He also had an expired registration for his car. He hasn't yet commented on the paparazzi case.

Photo courtesy Rob Rich/
Follow Us

SheKnows Media ‐ Entertainment

New in Entertainment

And you'll see personalized content just for you whenever you click the My Feed .

SheKnows is making some changes!

b h e a r d !

Welcome to the new SheKnows Community,

where you can share your stories, ideas

and CONNECT with millions of women.

Get Started