Start writing
Share this Story
/

Latest RHONY Episode Challenged in a Last-Minute Lawsuit

Christina Marfice

by

Trending writer

Christina is a reporter based in Boise, Idaho. She's a veteran vegetarian, a political junkie and a huge grammar snob. On the weekends, she can usually be found binging on Netflix, playing the piano or petting her cats, Daisy and Dandelion.

If you watched RHONY last tonight, you have a New York judge to thank

Let's all raise our chardonnay tonight to ​Manhattan Supreme ​Court Judge Gerald Lebovits tonight, because he's the reason we were able to tune into the latest episode of The Real Housewives of New York.

More: Carole Radziwill Was Closer to John F. Kennedy Jr.'s Death Than You Realize

The episode was challenged in a last-minute lawsuit from a woman who tried to block it from going on the air. Barbara Kavovit, a former contractor who invented a line of female-targeted tools called DIYVA, claimed she was illegally recorded by a cast member, and that Bravo had no right to air her voice or likeness on RHONY.

Kavovit was at a charity event in December in lower Manhattan, where she admits she knew crews were filming for RHONY. But in her lawsuit, she says she pulled RHONY cast member Carole Radziwill aside to have a private conversation — or so she thought. Later, Kavovit learned that Radziwill had been wearing a microphone at the time, but, um, of course she was, because she was filming for RHONY at that event.

More: Go home, Jill Zarin, you're drunk

Anyway, Kavovit's lawyer sent a letter to Bravo saying they didn't have her permission to air her "voice or likeness," and when no one responded, she filed an emergency lawsuit, in which her lawyer argued that New York City statutes say the network needs Kavovit's permission to use the recording for "commercial use." Attorneys for Bravo, on the other hand, argued that the show is a creative endeavor, and therefore protected by the First Amendment.

"How can I stop the millions of adoring fans from learning about this," Judge Lebovits joked before agreeing with Bravo's lawyers, saying, "There’s a heavy, heavy burden for a petitioner to overcome on First Amendment grounds"

He further defended his decision by adding, "If the court … prevents the TV show from airing tonight there will be irreparable injury to NBC Universal and possibly to millions of people who might be interested in watching."

More: Jules Wainstein, "Most Honest Person," Is Still Trashing Bethenny Frankel

The judge, however, won't be tuning in despite his decision in favor of the show. When asked whether he'd check it out, he said he has "a prior engagement."

Comments
Hot
New in Entertainment
Close

And you'll see personalized content just for you whenever you click the My Feed .

SheKnows is making some changes!

b h e a r d !

Welcome to the new SheKnows Community,

where you can share your stories, ideas

and CONNECT with millions of women.

Get Started