Share this Story

Samantha Armytage claps back at ridiculous press reports about her underwear

For Cailyn Cox, writing isn't just a hobby, it's her life. Passionate about Hollywood, she makes it her mission to find the most entertaining celebrity gossip for SheKnows readers. And when she's not enthralled in the celeb world, she's ...

TV host Samantha Armytage took a stand against an article about her ‘giant granny panties’

From SheKnows Australia

Has the world gone mad? Earlier this week, a woman was shamed because — wait for it — she chose to wear a full pair of underwear.

More: Madonna reveals what it's like to be a woman: Exhausting

On Dec, 11, the Daily Mail Australia decided to share photos from Sunrise host Samantha Armytage on a shopping trip in Bondi and bring attention to her "giant granny panties." Nice. According to the article, they "showed through the garment with a clearly visible line." Oh, Armytage, how dare you?!

It must be a slow day in the newsroom when one woman's choice of underwear makes headlines. Thankfully, the public haven't taken kindly to the article and Twitter has been abuzz with reactions.

More: 11 things feminists should brace themselves for now that Donald Trump has won

Instead of ignoring the report, Armytage took a stand for herself — and for women in general — when she threatened legal action. According to Brisbane Times, legal firm Addisons sent Daily Mail Australia a letter on behalf of the TV presenter claiming that she was "at a loss to understand the reasons why Daily Mail Australia had chosen to publish the article, which represents a gross invasion of her privacy."

"For reasons unknown to our client, it appears that the Daily Mail has developed an unhealthy interest in not only the reporting on our client but now seems determined to humiliate and shame her in the most base and personal way," continued the letter.

And it seems to have worked, because Daily Mail Australia has since responded with an apology.

More: Out of all the women Glamour could have honoured, they chose... a man?

In a statement issued in bold at the bottom of the original piece, the publication writes, "An earlier version of this story contained critical statements regarding Samantha Armytage’s appearance. While the story has since been amended, we apologise for any distress caused to Ms Armytage or readers more generally."

While this is a small victory for Armytage and will hopefully make the media think twice before degrading a woman and commenting on her choice of outfit, why are we still having to demand apologies from those who shame women for their physical appearance?

Was Armytage right to threaten legal action? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Follow Us

SheKnows Media ‐ Entertainment

New in Entertainment

And you'll see personalized content just for you whenever you click the My Feed .

SheKnows is making some changes!

b h e a r d !

Welcome to the new SheKnows Community,

where you can share your stories, ideas

and CONNECT with millions of women.

Get Started