What would you like to know?
Share this Story

Why we predict A Wrinkle in Time movie adaptation will fail

Sara Dobie Bauer is a writer and book nerd in Phoenix, AZ. She is an Ohio University alum, which means her college experience was more fun than yours. She is the author of the novel "Life Without Harry." She loves bad horror films, footb...

A Wrinkle in Time: Stop remaking the same movie

"Insanity" is defined as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Somebody should tell that to Disney.

Announced yesterday, Frozen co-writer and director Jennifer Lee will soon start work on a film adaptation of Madeleine L'Engle's A Wrinkle in Time. Sound familiar? Oh, yeah, because Disney did it once before.

Disney made a straight-to-video version of the book adaptation in 2003, and well, no one watched it. Critics weren't clawing their faces for more, and audiences didn't even give good reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.

Get to work! 100 Children's books to read in a lifetime >>

The book is not to blame. L'Engle's Wrinkle in Time (along with the rest of the series) is one of the books that saved me as a kid and made me feel like less of a weirdo. In the book, Meg and Charles Wallace lose their father under mysterious circumstances. With the help of handsome neighbor boy, Calvin, they are recruited by Mrs. Whatsit, Mrs. Who and Mrs. Which to go on a dangerous journey to rescue their dad. First, they just need to master time travel.

Regardless of an exciting plot, relatable characters and some true Stepford community creep factor, the first film version flopped. In fact, I didn't even know it existed until I did some homework. As a L'Engle fan, I should have known this existed!

I know Disney has assigned a successful name like Jennifer Lee to the project to garner some attention and create some buzz. Lee says the book was one of her favorites as a kid. Still, don't they know? Some books are not ripe for adapting.

JK Rowling posts new Harry Potter short story online >>

Look at Harry Potter versus Narnia. Harry Potter films were so popular, the world almost exploded with each premiere. Narnia (and I was raised with Narnia) ... I mean, are they even making those movies anymore? No one cares about Narnia, even though the C.S. Lewis collection is priceless.

Another example: The Hunger Games versus Percy Jackson. Obviously, The Hunger Games films are hot-hot-hot, but Percy Jackson flopped via film one, and there's no way the studio will make it through all the Rick Riordan books without going broke.

I truly believe it is all about the adaptation. Maybe the 2003 version of Wrinkle in Time was badly written. Maybe it didn't encompass L'Engle's world or her characters accurately. So I guess Jennifer Lee could save this project. I hope she's a L'Engle scholar by the time she's done because I won't have one of my favorite childhood books ruined... again.

American Gods: Why producing a TV adaptation is the worst idea ever >>

I still don't understand why we keep doing this: Why do we keep making the same movie over and over? For example, modern directors couldn't have done a better job of botching Hitchcock's Psycho. Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby was the same as the original but with better parties and rap music. Now, here we go again.

How did that business meeting go at Disney? "Let's make A Wrinkle in Time." ... "We already made A Wrinkle in Time." ... "Let's make it and spend more money making it." ... "Oh, OK."

Can't Hollywood think of anything new anymore? Why do they keep butchering our favorite books? Next thing I know, they'll remake To Kill a Mockingbird and inadvertently cause the apocalypse.

More reading

Best chapter books to excite young readers
JK Rowling's Harry Potter spin-off will be a trilogy
What do The Bachelor and The Hunger Games have in common?

Tagged in
Recommended for You
Comments
Hot
New in Entertainment
Close

And you'll see personalized content just for you whenever you click the My Feed .

SheKnows is making some changes!