Societal roles for females have greatly changed over time. Long gone is the vision of a woman daintly placing her arm on a male and needing the likes of smelling salts or a fainting couch.
The same can be said about her stereotypical role of being the homemaker, ensuring that her husband's meal is ready on the table when he arrives home from work and that the children and the house were hers to take care of.
What is interresting is the not so new dilema that has again been brought to the forefront of tradition and reality, women on the front lines.
I realized that some things haven't changed.
Men still want to protect the woman, they want to show that chivairy is not dead, they feel that it is their evolutionary role.
But, to allow a woman to fight for her country does'nt take away from or impedes a man's ability to do so and still remain chivalrous in the eyes of a woman.
I am a little concerned about these issues.
Just like the debate about gays in the military (or even their place in societal institutions), there's just as much opposition to females being on the front lines, given the concern for protection or other seemingly arcane reasons.
Yes, it is true that women aren't "built like a man" and they can't do some of the other things that are strictly genetically gender based.
But it doesn't take away from a woman's ability to get a job dones. Roles have changed. Life has changed.
And to deny a woman of such a right is no different from calling an African American less of a person. Do I like the mental picture of seeing a woman slaughtered on the front line? Well, it's no different from the mental picture of a man dying there as well.
It may be a bit more disturbing at first given what we are used to, but like many other things that have changed and progressed in life, it's something I'd have to get used to.
Who am I or anyone to say that I, a woman can't serve my country on the front lines? Yes, it's scary, it goes against everything that so many people grew up believing, but does it make it wrong?
Women have long been on the front lines, just not in front line infantry positions.
Can you imagine telling a woman who has single-handedly takes care of her family, who sacrifices so much of her life that she;s somehow too whatever to be allowed placement in harm's way?
It is ridiculos. Are we saying that the miltary is less capable of keeping a woman safe than a man?
Do I want to serve on the front lines? No.
But do I want to take away someone else's sbility to do so? Certainly not.
Are we to say that we, as women, are unable to make decisions of great consequences on our own?
It's true, that the government is there for the people, but sometimes, as we all know, the government meddles in things that they should remain out of.
A woman's choice, her desire to serve on the front lines is her choice, not everyone else's.
Despite all the reasons many come up with about women not having a place on the front lines, I'd have to say, the two sexes are complementary, not only in the battlefield of life, but also on the battlefield of war.
Joanne S. Reynolds
More from living